On Feb 13, 2020, at 3:15 AM, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > E2fsck directory rehashing code can fail with ENOSPC due to a bug in > ext2fs_htree_intnode_maxrecs() which fails to take metadata checksum > into account and thus e.g. e2fsck can decide to create 1 indirect level > of index tree when two are actually needed. Fix the logic to account for > metadata checksum. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h | 10 +++++++--- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h b/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h > index 93ecf29c568d..5fde3343b1f1 100644 > --- a/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h > +++ b/lib/ext2fs/ext2fs.h > @@ -1783,7 +1783,6 @@ extern blk_t ext2fs_group_first_block(ext2_filsys fs, dgrp_t group); > extern blk_t ext2fs_group_last_block(ext2_filsys fs, dgrp_t group); > extern blk_t ext2fs_inode_data_blocks(ext2_filsys fs, > struct ext2_inode *inode); > -extern int ext2fs_htree_intnode_maxrecs(ext2_filsys fs, int blocks); > extern unsigned int ext2fs_div_ceil(unsigned int a, unsigned int b); > extern __u64 ext2fs_div64_ceil(__u64 a, __u64 b); > extern int ext2fs_dirent_name_len(const struct ext2_dir_entry *entry); > @@ -2015,9 +2014,14 @@ _INLINE_ blk_t ext2fs_inode_data_blocks(ext2_filsys fs, > return (blk_t) ext2fs_inode_data_blocks2(fs, inode); > } > > -_INLINE_ int ext2fs_htree_intnode_maxrecs(ext2_filsys fs, int blocks) > +static inline int ext2fs_htree_intnode_maxrecs(ext2_filsys fs, int blocks) > { > - return blocks * ((fs->blocksize - 8) / sizeof(struct ext2_dx_entry)); > + int csum_size = 0; > + > + if (ext2fs_has_feature_metadata_csum(fs->super)) > + csum_size = sizeof(struct ext2_dx_tail); > + return blocks * ((fs->blocksize - (8 + csum_size)) / > + sizeof(struct ext2_dx_entry)); > } > > /* > -- > 2.16.4 > Cheers, Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP