On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 11:34:39AM -0800, ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > > One of the checks for an inode supporting DAX is if the inode is > reflinked. During a non-DAX to DAX state change we could race with > the file being reflinked and end up with a reflinked file being in DAX > state. > > Prevent this race by checking for DAX support under the MMAP_LOCK. The on disk inode flags are protected by the XFS_ILOCK, not the MMAP_LOCK. i.e. the MMAPLOCK provides data access serialisation, not metadata modification serialisation. > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 11 +++++++---- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c > index da1eb2bdb386..4ff402fd6636 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c > @@ -1194,10 +1194,6 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_dax_invalidate( > > *join_flags = 0; > > - if ((fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_DAX) == FS_XFLAG_DAX && > - !xfs_inode_supports_dax(ip)) > - return -EINVAL; > - > /* If the DAX state is not changing, we have nothing to do here. */ > if ((fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_DAX) && > (ip->i_d.di_flags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_DAX)) > @@ -1211,6 +1207,13 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_dax_invalidate( > > /* lock, flush and invalidate mapping in preparation for flag change */ > xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL); > + > + if ((fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_DAX) == FS_XFLAG_DAX && > + !xfs_inode_supports_dax(ip)) { > + error = -EINVAL; > + goto out_unlock; > + } Yes, you might be able to get away with reflink vs dax flag serialisation on the inode flag modification, but it is not correct and leaves a landmine for future inode flag modifications that are done without holding either the MMAP or IOLOCK. e.g. concurrent calls to xfs_ioctl_setattr() setting/clearing flags other than the on disk DAX flag are all serialised by the ILOCK_EXCL and will no be serialised against this DAX check. Hence if there are other flags that we add in future that affect the result of xfs_inode_supports_dax(), this code will not be correctly serialised. This raciness in checking the DAX flags is the reason that xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags() redoes all the reflink vs dax checks once it's called under the XFS_ILOCK_EXCL during the actual change transaction.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx