On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:49:38AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > Hello Darrick, > > On 1/28/20 8:58 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 03:48:28PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > > > Since ext4 already defines necessary iomap_ops required to move to iomap > > > for fiemap, so this patch makes those changes to use existing iomap_ops > > > for ext4_fiemap and thus removes all unwanted code. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > fs/ext4/extents.c | 279 +++++++--------------------------------------- > > > fs/ext4/inline.c | 41 ------- > > > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 282 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c > > > index 0de548bb3c90..901caee2fcb1 100644 > > > --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c > > > +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c > > > > <snip> Just a cursory glance... > > > > > @@ -5130,40 +4927,42 @@ static int ext4_xattr_fiemap(struct inode *inode, > > > EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize; > > > physical += offset; > > > length = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_inode_size - offset; > > > - flags |= FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_INLINE; > > > brelse(iloc.bh); > > > } else { /* external block */ > > > physical = (__u64)EXT4_I(inode)->i_file_acl << blockbits; > > > length = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize; > > > } > > > - if (physical) > > > - error = fiemap_fill_next_extent(fieinfo, 0, physical, > > > - length, flags); > > > - return (error < 0 ? error : 0); > > > + iomap->addr = physical; > > > + iomap->offset = 0; > > > + iomap->length = length; > > > + iomap->type = IOMAP_INLINE; > > > + iomap->flags = 0; > > > > Er... external "ACL" blocks aren't IOMAP_INLINE. > > Sorry, I should have mentioned about this too in the cover letter. > So current patchset is mainly only converting bmap & fiemap to use iomap > APIs. Even the original implementation does not have external ACL block > implemented for xattr_fiemap. Er ... yes it did. The "} else { /* external block */" block sets physical to i_file_acl. > Let me spend some time to implement it. But I would still like to keep > that as a separate patch. > > But thanks for looking into it. There's this point 2.a & 2.b mentioned in > the cover letter where I could really use your help in understanding > if all of that is a known behavior from iomap_fiemap side > (whenever you have some time of course :) ) i'll go have a look. --D > -ritesh >