Re: [PATCH] jbd2: modify assert condition in __journal_remove_journal_head

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2020/1/22 16:50, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 22-01-20 02:05:48, Shijie Luo wrote:
Only when jh->b_jcount = 0 in jbd2_journal_put_journal_head, we are allowed
to call __journal_remove_journal_head.

Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshijie1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the patch. You're right but given that
__journal_remove_journal_head() has exactly one caller and that checks for
jh->b_jcount == 0 just before calling __journal_remove_journal_head(), I
think the assertion is pretty pointless. So I'd rather just remove it
completely.

								Honza
Thanks for your review. It 's much better to remove the assertion.
---
  fs/jbd2/journal.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
index 5e408ee24a1a..4f417a7f1ae0 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
@@ -2556,7 +2556,7 @@ static void __journal_remove_journal_head(struct buffer_head *bh)
  {
  	struct journal_head *jh = bh2jh(bh);
- J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_jcount >= 0);
+	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_jcount == 0);
  	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == NULL);
  	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_next_transaction == NULL);
  	J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_cp_transaction == NULL);
--
2.19.1





[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux