Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] jbd2: make sure ESHUTDOWN to be recorded in the journal superblock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019/12/5 1:05, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 04-12-19 20:46:13, zhangyi (F) wrote:
>> Commit fb7c02445c49 ("ext4: pass -ESHUTDOWN code to jbd2 layer") want
>> to allow jbd2 layer to distinguish shutdown journal abort from other
>> error cases. So the ESHUTDOWN should be taken precedence over any other
>> errno which has already been recoded after EXT4_FLAGS_SHUTDOWN is set,
>> but it only update errno in the journal suoerblock now if the old errno
>> is 0.
>>
>> Fixes: fb7c02445c49 ("ext4: pass -ESHUTDOWN code to jbd2 layer")
>> Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Yeah, I think this is correct if I understand the logic correctly but I'd
> like Ted to have a look at this. Anyway, feel free to add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> 

Thanks for review.

Hi Ted, do you have time to look at this patch?

Thanks,
Yi.

> 
>> ---
>>  fs/jbd2/journal.c | 3 +--
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> index b2d6e7666d0f..93be6e0311da 100644
>> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
>> @@ -2109,8 +2109,7 @@ static void __journal_abort_soft (journal_t *journal, int errno)
>>  
>>  	if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_ABORT) {
>>  		write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
>> -		if (!old_errno && old_errno != -ESHUTDOWN &&
>> -		    errno == -ESHUTDOWN)
>> +		if (old_errno != -ESHUTDOWN && errno == -ESHUTDOWN)
>>  			jbd2_journal_update_sb_errno(journal);
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>> -- 
>> 2.17.2
>>




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux