Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
From: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 11:00:22 +0100
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Julia Cartwright <julia@xxxxxx>, Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>, Mark Fasheh <mark@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20191119093001.GA25605@quack2.suse.cz>
References: <20190820170818.oldsdoumzashhcgh@linutronix.de> <20190820171721.GA4949@bombadil.infradead.org> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908201959240.2223@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20191011112525.7dksg6ixb5c3hxn5@linutronix.de> <20191115145638.GA5461@quack2.suse.cz> <20191115175420.cotwwz5tmcwvllsq@linutronix.de> <20191118093845.GB17319@quack2.suse.cz> <20191118132824.rclhrbujqh4b4g4d@linutronix.de> <20191119093001.GA25605@quack2.suse.cz>

On 2019-11-19 10:30:01 [+0100], Jan Kara wrote:
> OK, how do we push this? Do you plan to push this through tip tree?

Is it reasonable to push this via the ext4 tree?

> 								Honza

Sebastian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Jan Kara

References:
- [PATCH] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Sebastian Siewior
- Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Matthew Wilcox
- Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Sebastian Siewior
- Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH v2] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Sebastian Siewior
- Re: [PATCH v2] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Jan Kara
- [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Sebastian Siewior
- Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
  - From: Jan Kara

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3] fs/buffer: Make BH_Uptodate_Lock bit_spin_lock a regular spinlock_t
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]