---- 在 星期三, 2019-11-06 13:03:36 Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> 撰写 ---- > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 12:37:35PM +0800, Chengguang Xu wrote: > > ---- 在 星期二, 2019-10-15 19:25:23 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> 撰写 ---- > > > On Tue 15-10-19 18:23:27, Chengguang Xu wrote: > > > > Setting softlimit larger than hardlimit seems meaningless > > > > for disk quota but currently it is allowed. In this case, > > > > there may be a bit of comfusion for users when they run > > > > df comamnd to directory which has project quota. > > > > > > > > For example, we set 20M softlimit and 10M hardlimit of > > > > block usage limit for project quota of test_dir(project id 123). > > > > > > > > [root@hades mnt_ext4]# repquota -P -a > > > > *** Report for project quotas on device /dev/loop0 > > > > Block grace time: 7days; Inode grace time: 7days > > > > Block limits File limits > > > > Project used soft hard grace used soft hard grace > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > 0 -- 13 0 0 2 0 0 > > > > 123 -- 10237 20480 10240 5 200 100 > > > > > > > > The result of df command as below: > > > > > > > > [root@hades mnt_ext4]# df -h test_dir > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > > > > /dev/loop0 20M 10M 10M 50% /home/cgxu/test/mnt_ext4 > > > > > > > > Even though it looks like there is another 10M free space to use, > > > > if we write new data to diretory test_dir(inherit project id), > > > > the write will fail with errno(-EDQUOT). > > > > > > > > After this patch, the df result looks like below. > > > > > > > > [root@hades mnt_ext4]# df -h test_dir > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > > > > /dev/loop0 10M 10M 3.0K 100% /home/cgxu/test/mnt_ext4 > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > - Fix a bug in the limit setting logic. > > > > > > Thanks for the patch! It looks good to me. You can add: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > I have a proposal for another direction. > > Could we add a check for soft limit in quota layer when setting the value? > > So that we could not bother with specific file systems on statfs(). > > How do the other filesystems (e.g. xfs) behave if someone tries to set a > soft limit higher than the hard limit? > In xfs if (hard && hard < soft), the limit will not be set(or changed) but command xfs_quota does not return error. Thanks, Chengguang
