Howdy Ted! On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 02:20:40PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > Hi Matthew, could you do me a favor? For the next (and hopefully > final :-) spin of this patch series, could you base it on the > ext4.git's master branch. Then pull in Darrick's iomap-for-next > branch, and then apply your patches on top of that. > > I attempted to do this with the v6 patch series --- see the tt/mb-dio > branch --- and I described on another e-mail thread, I appear to have > screwed up that patch conflicts, since it's causing a failure with > diroead-nolock using a 1k block size. Since this wasn't something > that worked when you were first working on the patch set, this isn't > something I'm going to consider blocking, especially since a flay test > failure which happens 7% of the time, and using dioread_nolock with a > sub-page blocksize isn't something that is going to be all that common > (since it wasn't working at all up until now). > > Still, I'm hoping that either Ritesh or you can figure out how my > simple-minded handling of the patch conflict between your and his > patch series can be addressed properly. OK, I will try get around to this tonight. :) --<M>--
