t_ext_jnl_rm test takes 96 seconds to finish

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello there,

While building e2fsprogs 1.45.4, I noticed the following output during
testing:

t_ext_jnl_rm: remove missing external journal device: ok
t_ext_jnl_rm:  *** took 96 seconds to finish ***
t_ext_jnl_rm:  consider adding t_ext_jnl_rm/is_slow_test

I didn't see any mention of this in the list archives, and I'm not
entirely sure if it should really be marked as a slow test.

System is a 64-thread POWER9 @ 3.8 GHz with DDR4-2400 RAM, so it isn't
exactly a "low end" machine.

Let me know if you need any further detail from my end; I'll be happy to
provide it.  Thank you.

Best to you and yours,
--arw

-- 
A. Wilcox (awilfox)
Project Lead, Adélie Linux
https://www.adelielinux.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux