Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix a bug in ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2019/9/18 18:45, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 17-09-19 16:48:14, yangerkun wrote:
No need to wait when offset equals to 0. And it will trigger a bug since
the latter __ext4_journalled_invalidatepage can free the buffers but leave
page still dirty.

[   26.057508] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   26.058531] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:2134!
...
[   26.088130] Call trace:
[   26.088695]  ext4_writepage+0x914/0xb28
[   26.089541]  writeout.isra.4+0x1b4/0x2b8
[   26.090409]  move_to_new_page+0x3b0/0x568
[   26.091338]  __unmap_and_move+0x648/0x988
[   26.092241]  unmap_and_move+0x48c/0xbb8
[   26.093096]  migrate_pages+0x220/0xb28
[   26.093945]  kernel_mbind+0x828/0xa18
[   26.094791]  __arm64_sys_mbind+0xc8/0x138
[   26.095716]  el0_svc_common+0x190/0x490
[   26.096571]  el0_svc_handler+0x60/0xd0
[   26.097423]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc

Run below parallel can reproduce it easily(ext3):
void main()
{
         int fd, fd1, fd2, fd3, ret;
         void *addr;
         size_t length = 4096;
         int flags;
         off_t offset = 0;
         char *str = "12345";

         fd = open("a", O_RDWR | O_CREAT);
         assert(fd >= 0);

         ret = ftruncate(fd, length);
         assert(ret == 0);

         fd1 = open("a", O_RDWR | O_CREAT, -1);
         assert(fd1 >= 0);

         flags = 0xc00f;/*Journal data mode*/
         ret = ioctl(fd1, _IOW('f', 2, long), &flags);
         assert(ret == 0);

         fd2 = open("a", O_RDWR | O_CREAT);
         assert(fd2 >= 0);

         fd3 = open("a", O_TRUNC | O_NOATIME);
         assert(fd3 >= 0);

         addr = mmap(NULL, length, 0xe, 0x28013, fd2, offset);

Ugh, these mmap flags look pretty bogus. Were they generated by some
fuzzer?
Yeah, generated by syzkaller.

         assert(addr != (void *)-1);
         memcpy(addr, str, 5);

Also the O_TRUNC open above will truncate "a" to 0 so the mapping is
actually beyond i_size and this memcpy should fail with SIGBUS. So I'm
surprised your test program gets up to mbind()...

We run the program parallel, sometimes will run as below:

reproduce1                         reproduce2

...                            |   ...
truncate to 4k                 |
change to journal data mode    |
                               |   memcpy(set page dirty)
truncate to 0:                 |
ext4_setattr:                  |
...                            |
ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit |
                               |   mbind(trigger bug)
truncate_pagecache(clean dirty)|   ...
...                            |
Reproduce2 will mark page as dirty by memcpy, then mbind run between ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit and truncate_pagecache in ext4_setattr can trigger the bug with page still be dirty but buffer head has been free.

So sorry for the incomprehensible description! I will reorganize and resend the patch!

Thanks a lot.

         mbind(addr, length, 0, 0, 0, 2);

         close(fd);
         munmap(addr, length);
}

Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx>

I agree that there's no need to wait for transaction commit when offset ==
0. So your patch is correct in that regard. What still escapes me is why
this is necessary. I have a feeling that it just papers over the real
problem.  You mention crash in ext4_writepage() because page is dirty but
has no buffers - but how come the page is dirty? If offset == 0 for a page,
truncate_inode_pages() should have cleaned PageDirty flag so the page
should never get to ext4_writepage() in the first place. Together with my
comments about the test case this is still a bit mystery to me... I guess
I'll try to reproduce this to understand this better.

								Honza

---
  fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 006b7a2070bf..a9943ae4f74d 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -5479,7 +5479,7 @@ static void ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit(struct inode *inode)
  	 * do. We do the check mainly to optimize the common PAGE_SIZE ==
  	 * blocksize case
  	 */
-	if (offset > PAGE_SIZE - i_blocksize(inode))
+	if (!offset || offset > PAGE_SIZE - i_blocksize(inode))
  		return;
  	while (1) {
  		page = find_lock_page(inode->i_mapping,
--
2.17.2





[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux