On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:39 PM Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2019, at 09:02, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > When ext4 file systems were created intentionally with 128 byte inodes, > > the rate-limited warning of eventual possible timestamp overflow are > > still emitted rather frequently. Remove the warning for now. > > > > Discussion for whether any warning is needed, > > and where it should be emitted, can be found at > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1567523922.5576.57.camel@xxxxxx/. > > I can post a separate follow-up patch after the conclusion. > > > > Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> > > I'd be in favor of a severely rare-limited warning in the actual case > that Y2038 timestamps cannot be stored, but the current message is > too verbose for now and I agree it is better to remove it while discussions > on the best solution are underway. > > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> Agreed completely. Applied on top of the y2038 branch now, thanks a lot for the update! This should be part of tomorrow's linux-next then. Arnd
