[PATCH 4/7] jbd2: Drop unnecessary branch from jbd2_journal_forget()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We have cleared both dirty & jbddirty bits from the bh. So there's no
difference between bforget() and brelse(). Thus there's no point jumping
to no_jbd branch.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index c4fe050e78c6..9ccef3d6e817 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -1596,10 +1596,6 @@ int jbd2_journal_forget (handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
 		} else {
 			__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer(jh);
 			jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh);
-			if (!buffer_jbd(bh)) {
-				spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
-				goto not_jbd;
-			}
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 	} else if (jh->b_transaction) {
-- 
2.16.4




[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux