> On Jul 23, 2019, at 5:17 AM, Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ted & Jan, > Could you please give your valuable comments? It seems like the original patches should be reverted? There is no data in the original commit message that indicates there is an actual performance improvement from that patch, but there is data here showing it hurts both read and write performance quite significantly. Cheers, Andreas > On 19/7/19 17:22, Joseph Qi wrote: >> Hi Ted & Jan, >> I've observed an significant performance regression with the following >> commit in my Intel P3600 NVMe SSD. >> 16c54688592c ext4: Allow parallel DIO reads >> >> From my initial investigation, it may be because of the >> inode_lock_shared (down_read) consumes more than inode_lock (down_write) >> in mixed random read write workload. >> >> Here is my test result. >> >> ioengine=psync >> direct=1 >> rw=randrw >> iodepth=1 >> numjobs=8 >> size=20G >> runtime=600 >> >> w/ parallel dio reads : kernel 5.2.0 >> w/o parallel dio reads: kernel 5.2.0, then revert the following commits: >> 1d39834fba99 ext4: remove EXT4_STATE_DIOREAD_LOCK flag (related) >> e5465795cac4 ext4: fix off-by-one error when writing back pages before dio read (related) >> 16c54688592c ext4: Allow parallel DIO reads >> >> bs=4k: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/ parallel dio reads | READ 30898KB/s, 7724, 555.00us | WRITE 30875KB/s, 7718, 479.70us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/o parallel dio reads| READ 117915KB/s, 29478, 248.18us | WRITE 117854KB/s，29463, 21.91us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> bs=16k: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/ parallel dio reads | READ 58961KB/s, 3685, 835.28us | WRITE 58877KB/s, 3679, 1335.98us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/o parallel dio reads| READ 218409KB/s, 13650, 554.46us | WRITE 218257KB/s，13641, 29.22us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> bs=64k: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/ parallel dio reads | READ 119396KB/s, 1865, 1759.38us | WRITE 119159KB/s, 1861, 2532.26us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/o parallel dio reads| READ 422815KB/s, 6606, 1146.05us | WRITE 421619KB/s, 6587, 60.72us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> bs=512k: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/ parallel dio reads | READ 392973KB/s, 767, 5046.35us | WRITE 393165KB/s, 767, 5359.86us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/o parallel dio reads| READ 590266KB/s, 1152, 4312.01us | WRITE 590554KB/s, 1153, 2606.82us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> bs=1M: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/ parallel dio reads | READ 487779KB/s, 476, 8058.55us | WRITE 485592KB/s, 474, 8630.51us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> w/o parallel dio reads| READ 593927KB/s, 580, 7623.63us | WRITE 591265KB/s, 577, 6163.42us >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Thanks, >> Joseph >> Cheers, Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
