On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:50:35AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > The shared/006 test needs some way of descriminating which inodes have > > a fixed number of inodes, since it fills a small file system until it > > runs out of space and then runs fsck on it. Actually, if we make the > > test file system smaller, so it runs in finite time, we could probably > > just run it on all file systems, since checking to see what file > > systems which don't have a fixed inode table (e.g., btrfs) do under > > ENOSPC when creating tons of inodes probably makes sense there for > > those file systems as well. > > xfs doesn't have a fixed inode table either, so ... that sounds like a > good idea. Which is amusing, given that shared/006 declares that it is supported for xfs. So it might just work on btrfs w/o any changes; although maybe it just takes too long to run. :-) - Ted
