On May 31, 2019, at 6:10 AM, Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In the "out" label we only iput old/new_ea_inode-s, in all these places > these variables are always NULL so there is no point in goto to "out". > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I'm not a fan of changes like this, since it adds potential complexity/bugs if the error handling path is changed in the future. That is one of the major benefits of the "goto out_*" model of error handling is that you only need to add one new label to the end of the function when some new state is added that needs to be cleaned up, compared to having to check each individual error to see if something needs to be cleaned up. Cheers, Andreas > --- > fs/ext4/xattr.c | 9 +++------ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c > index 491f9ee4040e..ac2ddd4446b3 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c > @@ -1601,8 +1601,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i, > next = EXT4_XATTR_NEXT(last); > if ((void *)next >= s->end) { > EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "corrupted xattr entries"); > - ret = -EFSCORRUPTED; > - goto out; > + return -EFSCORRUPTED; > } > if (!last->e_value_inum && last->e_value_size) { > size_t offs = le16_to_cpu(last->e_value_offs); > @@ -1620,8 +1619,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i, > free += EXT4_XATTR_LEN(name_len) + old_size; > > if (free < EXT4_XATTR_LEN(name_len) + new_size) { > - ret = -ENOSPC; > - goto out; > + return -ENOSPC; > } > > /* > @@ -1634,8 +1632,7 @@ static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i, > new_size && is_block && > (min_offs + old_size - new_size) < > EXT4_XATTR_BLOCK_RESERVE(inode)) { > - ret = -ENOSPC; > - goto out; > + return -ENOSPC; > } > } > > -- > 2.20.1 > Cheers, Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP