On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 12:25:27PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Given how we've simplified how we handle Unicode --- in particular, > not doing any kind of normalization unless we are doing case-folding > compares, I think it will be more user-friendly if we rename the > feature from fname_encoding to casefold. TBH /me hadn't done enough reviewing even to notice the feature was named 'fname_encoding' (whatever that means -- encoded how?). IMHO 'casefold' is more descriptive about what the feature provides (folding case for directory name comparisons, right?) --D > > What do you think? Any objections? > > - Ted
