Re: [PATCH 02/13] fscrypt: remove the "write" part of struct fscrypt_ctx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] fscrypt: remove the "write" part of struct fscrypt_ctx
From: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 20:41:26 +0530
Cc: linux-fscrypt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190501224515.43059-3-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Organization: IBM
References: <20190501224515.43059-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20190501224515.43059-3-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 4:15:04 AM IST Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Now that fscrypt_ctx is not used for writes, remove the 'w' fields.
>

Looks good to me,

Reviewed-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
chandan

References:
- [PATCH 00/13] fscrypt, ext4: prepare for blocksize != PAGE_SIZE
  - From: Eric Biggers
- [PATCH 02/13] fscrypt: remove the "write" part of struct fscrypt_ctx
  - From: Eric Biggers

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/13] fscrypt: simplify bounce page handling
Next by Date: Change feature name from fname_encoding to casefold?
Previous by thread: [PATCH 02/13] fscrypt: remove the "write" part of struct fscrypt_ctx
Next by thread: [PATCH 01/13] fscrypt: simplify bounce page handling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux