On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 03:25:15AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:15:48PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:06:57PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 01:21:14PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Use 'READ_ONCE(inode->i_link)' to explicitly support filesystems caching > > > > the symlink target in ->i_link later if it was unavailable at iget() > > > > time, or wasn't easily available. I'll be doing this in fscrypt, to > > > > improve the performance of encrypted symlinks on ext4, f2fs, and ubifs. > > > > > > > > ->i_link will start NULL and may later be set to a non-NULL value by a > > > > smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release(). READ_ONCE() is needed on the > > > > read side. smp_load_acquire() is unnecessary because only a data > > > > dependency barrier is required. (Thanks to Al for pointing this out.) > > > > > > You've missed vfs_readlink()... > > > > How so? The patch already updates vfs_readlink(). > > Huh? Right you are - fsck knows how have I managed to misread that... > Anyway, I can pick that READ_ONCE() patch through vfs.git if you wish, > or it can go through your tree with my Acked-by - up to you... Unless you expect merge conflicts, it's easier for me to take it through the fscrypt tree, since it's a small patch and the second patch technically isn't correct without it. I'll add your Acked-by. Are you planning to review the second patch too? Thanks! - Eric
