Hi Ted,
Would you please review this patch?
Thanks,
Jiufei
On 2019/3/11 下午2:45, Joseph Qi wrote:
>
>
> On 19/3/11 14:35, Jiufei Xue wrote:
>> We see the following NULL pointer dereference while running xfstests
>> generic/475:
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
>> PGD 8000000c84bad067 P4D 8000000c84bad067 PUD c84e62067 PMD 0
>> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
>> CPU: 7 PID: 9886 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8 #10
>> RIP: 0010:ext4_do_update_inode+0x4ec/0x760
>> ...
>> Call Trace:
>> ? jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x42/0x50
>> ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x2c/0x70
>> ? ext4_truncate+0x186/0x3f0
>> ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0x61/0x80
>> ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x62/0x1b0
>> ext4_truncate+0x186/0x3f0
>> ? unmap_mapping_pages+0x56/0x100
>> ext4_setattr+0x817/0x8b0
>> notify_change+0x1df/0x430
>> do_truncate+0x5e/0x90
>> ? generic_permission+0x12b/0x1a0
>>
>> This is triggered because the NULL pointer handle->h_transaction was
>> dereferenced in function ext4_update_inode_fsync_trans().
>> I found that the h_transaction was set to NULL in jbd2__journal_restart
>> but failed to attached to a new transaction while the journal is aborted.
>>
>> Fix this by checking the handle before updating the inode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks good.
> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> ---
>> fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
>> index a1ac7e9245ec..75a5309f2231 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
>> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static inline void ext4_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle_t *handle,
>> {
>> struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
>>
>> - if (ext4_handle_valid(handle)) {
>> + if (ext4_handle_valid(handle) && !is_handle_aborted(handle)) {
>> ei->i_sync_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid;
>> if (datasync)
>> ei->i_datasync_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid;
>>
>
