Re: [PATCH] Fix tst_super_size after ext2_super_block changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:09:26PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 9:08 AM, Artem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Commits "Reserve feature bit and SB field bit for filename encoding"
> > and "Add timestamp extension bits to superblock" change
> > ext2_super_block structure, but don't change tst_super_size test,
> > so "make check" fails with message:
> > 
> > error: s_reserved size 380 should be 392
> 
> How did these patches even land without "make check" being run once?
> Does this test failure not cause "make check" to fail?

My bad; I failed to run the make check before pushing it out.  I fixed
this before seeing Artem's patch, and the fix was what he pushed out.

     	    	   	   	      - Ted



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux