https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201685 --- Comment #90 from Hao Wei Tee (angelsl@xxxxxxx) --- (In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #87) > Maybe one day someone will become truly invested in the kernel development > process and we'll have proper QA/QC/unit testing/regression > testing/fuzzying What we have now is not proper? syzkaller bot, Linux Test Project, kernelci.org, xfstests, and more that I don't know of. Probably more than any other OS. I think it's fair to say Linux has by far more configuration options than any other kernel out there. It's not feasible to test every single possible combination. Things will slip through the cracks, especially bugs like this one where clearly there is something wrong, but not everyone is able to reproduce it at all. Automated tests are going to miss bugs like this. We're not doing things worse than anyone else. Apple's APFS had major issues. Microsoft just had a big problem with their Windows 10 1809 rollout. Anyway, I remember you from another post you made to LKML complaining about Linux. You really don't like the way Linux is developed. Why do you still use it? I digress. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
