On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:12:52PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > The generic/081 regression appears to be a device-mapper issue... > > I'll see if this reproduces for me. Doesn't seem to be related to the DAX > patches you caary though. It does seem to be a DAX-specific failure though. > > The generic/344 failure seems to be caused by a WARNING triggered in > > the nvdimm code: > > OK, apparently this is nothing new for you as generic/344 fails for you > even with 3.17. But it should not :). I'll try to see if I can reproduce > this in my test setup during more test runs (I don't remember seeing it > during occasional runs I do) and debug it further. Thanks! In case it wasn't clear, I wasn't planning on letting these failures prevent the patches from going upstream. As you say, the generic/081 failure looks unrelated to ext4, and the generic/344 isn't a regression. - Ted
