Re: allowing ext4 file systems that wrapped inode count to continue working

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:47:18PM +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> 
> Just a note.  In order to be able to utilize dumpe2fs I had to apply the
> patch from my first email.  The only utility that would start up (and
> fail) was fsck.  It should be noted that I've hacked s_inodes_count to
> 0xFFFFFFFF the first time we encountered this (with assistance from Jan).
> 
> Group 524287: (Blocks 17179836416-17179869183) csum 0xe0ea
> [INODE_UNINIT, ITABLE_ZEROED]
>   Group descriptor at 17179836416
>   Block bitmap at 17179344911 (bg #524272 + 15)
>   Inode bitmap at 17179344927 (bg #524272 + 31)
>   Inode table at 17179352608-17179353119 (bg #524272 + 7712)
>   12 free blocks, 8192 free inodes, 0 directories, 8192 unused inodes
>   Free blocks: 17179838452-17179838463
>   Free inodes: 4294959105-4294967296
> 
> If I read that correctly none of the inodes are in use, but there are
> some data blocks in use (in fact, most of it).
> 
> Suggestions/pointers on how to get those blocks re-allocated elsewhere?

I'd suggest trying to see if you can use debugfs's icheck command to
take a block number (such as 17179353120, for example, just beyond the
inode table) and map it to an inode number:

debugfs: icheck 17179353120

This will give you some inode number, perhaps 156789 (for example).
You can then take the inode number and map it to a pathname:

debugfs: ncheck 156789

You can then mount the file system, copy that file off, and then
delete it.  Then see what blocks are left as in use.  Lather, Rinse,
Repeat.  :-)

						- Ted



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux