The -EBUSY return value of dquot_enable() function means that just
want to update flags. If some users make a duplicate request to update
flags, lockdep could catch the false positive casued by needing to
allocate a quota block from inside ext4_map_blocks(), while holding
i_data_sem for a data inode. This results in this complaint:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&s->s_dquot.dqio_mutex);
lock(&ei->i_data_sem);
lock(&s->s_dquot.dqio_mutex);
lock(&ei->i_data_sem);
Signed-off-by: Junil Lee <junil0814.lee@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 13d2706..0757c9a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -5637,7 +5637,7 @@ static int ext4_quota_enable(struct super_block *sb, int type, int format_id,
lockdep_set_quota_inode(qf_inode, I_DATA_SEM_QUOTA);
err = dquot_enable(qf_inode, type, format_id, flags);
iput(qf_inode);
- if (err)
+ if (err && err != -EBUSY)
lockdep_set_quota_inode(qf_inode, I_DATA_SEM_NORMAL);
return err;
--
2.6.2
