On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 08:55:34AM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > Understandable. I didn't really like the idea of adding separate options > for that so I changed the -d parameter. Adding a new extended options doesn't bother me that much, since a global default to supress all xattr copying is probably something that a number of folks would find generically useful. > I'm not the target user either, but the -d options scheme I proposed > is not really in conflict with supporting external config file as well. It's not, but if we had an external config file, then the -d options scheme would be duplicated functionality, and the advantage of using the profile parsing code is we don't need to implement a new set of config parsing code, which is its own extra bit of complexity and opportunity for Coverity/gcc -Wall nits. :-) - Ted
