Re: [PATCH 03/10] tests: clean up $DEBUGFS_EXE usage in scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 10:25:59PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Instead of putting the entire test script under an implicit
> "if test -x $DEBUGFS_EXE" conditional (sometimes indenting
> the code, and sometimes not), rather check for the reverse
> and exit the test script early if $DEBUGFS_EXE is missing.
> 
> In some places, tests were running $DEBUGFS_EXE directly,
> when they should be running $DEBUGFS (which will run with
> Fortify, or other options).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, applied.

				- Ted



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux