https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199181 --- Comment #3 from Theodore Tso (tytso@xxxxxxx) --- Thanks for the bug report. The following should address the problem you have reported. commit 25584a8748b1f5404abcdc87c9fac21681eec5d2 Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> Date: Sat Mar 24 01:48:34 2018 -0400 ext4: add validity checks for bitmap block numbers https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199181 Reported-by: Wen Xu <wen.xu@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c index f82c4966f4ce..a33d8fb1bf2a 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c @@ -338,20 +338,25 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, /* check whether block bitmap block number is set */ blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc); offset = blk - group_first_block; - if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) + if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize || + !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) /* bad block bitmap */ return blk; /* check whether the inode bitmap block number is set */ blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc); offset = blk - group_first_block; - if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) + if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize || + !ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data)) /* bad block bitmap */ return blk; /* check whether the inode table block number is set */ blk = ext4_inode_table(sb, desc); offset = blk - group_first_block; + if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= sb->s_blocksize || + EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) >= sb->s_blocksize) + return blk; next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data, EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group), EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset)); @@ -417,6 +422,7 @@ struct buffer_head * ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group) { struct ext4_group_desc *desc; + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); struct buffer_head *bh; ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk; int err; @@ -425,6 +431,12 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group) if (!desc) return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED); bitmap_blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc); + if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) || + (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) { + ext4_error(sb, "Invalid block bitmap block %llu in " + "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group); + return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED); + } bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk); if (unlikely(!bh)) { ext4_error(sb, "Cannot get buffer for block bitmap - " diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c index 3fa93665b4a3..df92e3ec9913 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static struct buffer_head * ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group) { struct ext4_group_desc *desc; + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); struct buffer_head *bh = NULL; ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk; int err; @@ -131,6 +132,12 @@ ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group) return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED); bitmap_blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc); + if ((bitmap_blk <= le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block)) || + (bitmap_blk >= ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es))) { + ext4_error(sb, "Invalid inode bitmap blk %llu in " + "block_group %u", bitmap_blk, block_group); + return ERR_PTR(-EFSCORRUPTED); + } bh = sb_getblk(sb, bitmap_blk); if (unlikely(!bh)) { ext4_error(sb, "Cannot read inode bitmap - " -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
