On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 04:59:22PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > It doesn't make sense for EXT4_EXTENTS_FL to be set on a fast symlink. > The kernel doesn't set it, and it ignores it if set. Meanwhile, e2fsck > is stricter: it will try to validate the extent tree, which will almost > certainly fail (assuming the symlink is, in fact, a fast symlink). > > Make this behavior more explicit by rejecting EXT4_EXTENTS_FL for fast > symlinks, rather than going ahead and trying to validate an extent tree. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, applied. - Ted