https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198187 --- Comment #9 from lavv17@xxxxxxxxx --- You are correct that we use plain SATA drives. LVM on top of them, with raid1 mode. 18 янв. 2018 г. 13:06 пользователь <bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> написал: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198187 > > --- Comment #8 from Jan Kara (jack@xxxxxxx) --- > Thanks for the output. So every process there waits for jbd2 thread to > commit > the running transaction. JBD2 does: > > [144526.447408] jbd2/dm-19-8 D 0 1580 2 0x00000080 > [144526.448176] Call Trace: > [144526.448937] __schedule+0x3be/0x830 > [144526.449632] ? scsi_request_fn+0x3f/0x6b0 > [144526.450310] ? bit_wait+0x60/0x60 > [144526.450993] schedule+0x36/0x80 > [144526.451673] io_schedule+0x16/0x40 > [144526.452343] bit_wait_io+0x11/0x60 > [144526.453017] __wait_on_bit+0x58/0x90 > [144526.453692] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x8e/0xb0 > [144526.454371] ? bit_waitqueue+0x40/0x40 > [144526.455051] __wait_on_buffer+0x32/0x40 > [144526.455731] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0xfa4/0x1800 > [144526.456414] kjournald2+0xd2/0x270 > [144526.457098] ? kjournald2+0xd2/0x270 > [144526.457782] ? remove_wait_queue+0x70/0x70 > [144526.458470] kthread+0x109/0x140 > [144526.459139] ? commit_timeout+0x10/0x10 > [144526.459821] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60 > [144526.460497] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x150 > [144526.461166] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 > > So we have submitted buffers for IO and they have not completed. In cases > like > this the problem is in 99% of cases either in the storage driver or in the > storage firmware. Since you mentioned this started happening after kernel > update and you seem to be using only plain SATA drives (am I right?), > storage > firmware is probably out of question. > > You seem to be using some kind of RAID on top of these SATA drives, that > would > look like the most probable culprit at this point. Can you describe your > storage configuration? Also output of 'dmsetup table' would be useful. > After > having that we would probably need to pull in DM developers to have a look. > Thanks. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
