Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 05:12:24AM -0200, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: >> From: Olaf Weber <olaf@xxxxxxx> >> >> Add files from the Unicode Character Database, version 7.0.0, to the source. >> A helper program that generates a trie used for normalization from these >> files is part of a separate commit. > > It looks like the latest version of Unicode is 10.0.0. Once we pick a > Unicode version, changing will be painful; but in the absence of > interop requirements, is there a reason to stick with Unicode 7? Why > not take the latest version of Unicode and then freeze on it? > Hi Ted, No, there isn't a specific reason for unicode 7 and I forgot to mention this in my cover letter. I have successfully generated the data file for 10.0.0 with the mkutf8data script, but I couldn't validate it entirely yet. I walked through changelogs to make sure any relevant changes where there, but I'm not done yet. You can definitely expect new versions of the patchset to support 10.0.0. Thanks, -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
