On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:58:52 +0100 Adam Borowski <kilobyte@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This link is replicated in most filesystems' config stanzas. Referring > to an archived version of that site is pointless as it mostly deals with > patches; user documentation is available elsewhere. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > No changes, acks added (Dave Kleikamp's came without CCs). > > Acked: btrfs ceph cifs ext2 f2fs jfs xfs. > No ack: . 9p ext4 hfsplus jffs2 reiserfs -- but there's no point in caring > this much for a trivial doc update, molesting the maintainers further is a > waste of their time. So how would you like this to go upstream? I can certainly take it through docs, but it seems like vfs might be the first choice...? Thanks, jon
