https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197045 --- Comment #8 from Elvis Stansvik (elvstone@xxxxxxxxx) --- Though I wonder if that is correct, or if it was hastily added by mistake for ecryptfs as part of that mass porting to rename2.. Maybe it would just work if ecryptfs_rename simply forwarded the flags to vfs_rename without checking them..? Someone who knows the code will have to answer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
