On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 08:54:06AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > If fallocate(2) is called with the FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE flag, either
>
> According to patch without keep size flag?
Oops, thanks for catching that. I'll fix the commit description.
> BTW looking at the patch, does truncate racing with fallocate that
> would increase size beyond truncated size works correctly?
Yes, because we the inode is locked via i_mutex (well, now an write
lock on i_rwsem) during both truncate and fallocate operations.
- Ted
