On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Vijay Chidambaram <vvijay03@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Josef and Amir, > ... > > @Amir: Given that Josef's code is already in the kernel, do you think > changing CrashMonkey code would be useful? We are always happy to > provide something for upstream, but we want to be sure how much work > would be involved. > Simply put, people (myself included) are more likely to use CrashMonkey if it uses upstream kernel and/or if it brings valuable functionality to filesystem testing, beyond what log-writes already does - I am have not studies either tools yet to be able to determine if that is the case. Cheers, Amir.
