On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 12:32:07PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > For some odd reason, it forces a byte-by-byte copy of each field. A > plain old swap() on most of these fields would be more efficient. We > do need to retain the memswap of i_data however as that field is an array. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Thanks, applied. - Ted