Christoph, Am 23.05.2017 um 10:48 schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:41:16AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> UBIFS has no inode generations, inodes simply can't wrap around. >> We "handle" it like JFF2 does, we assumes that the NAND is long dead >> before we reach the maximum inode number. > > So you never ever reuse an inode number once it's been unlinked and > the last opener went away? Correct. > If that is the case please add a comment explaining this next to > the get_inode helper. Will do. Thanks, //richard
