On 1/7/17 7:14 AM, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > Hello! > > Why should it go? > Found no explanation. > What alternative is there to reduce unnecessary FS traffic? It was a journey from not /requiring/ -o acl to use acls and making it the default, to ultimately deprecating the noacl option. The hope was that over the many years of the transition, anyone who needed the old behavior would speak up. :) You could always compile without CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL if you're really concerned about it. That's build time, not a per-filesystem switch, of course. If you have data to show that the inability to turn it off is harmful, please share. Thanks, -Eric > Kind regards, > Udo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
