On Wed 04-01-17 15:21:28, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 16:43 +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Tue 20-12-16 10:55:41, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > > > For some odd reason, it forces a byte-by-byte copy of each field. A > > > plain old swap() on most of these fields would be more efficient. We > > > do need to retain one memswap however as that field is an array. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Looks good to me. You can add: > > > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > > > Honza > > > > Thanks. Yeah, it's certainly nothing critical -- just something I > noticed while looking at the i_version rework. Seems like it might be > good to let soak in next for v4.11? Yeah, it is definitely 4.11 material. I believe he'll pick up the patch to his tree once he starts accumulating patches for the next merge window. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
