Re: [PATCH] ext2: reject inodes with negative size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 06-12-16 15:59:01, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Don't load an inode with a negative size; this causes integer overflow
> problems in the VFS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, I've added the patch to my tree.

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ext2/inode.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> index 41b8b44..01f6d4b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
> @@ -1476,6 +1476,10 @@ struct inode *ext2_iget (struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>  		inode->i_size |= ((__u64)le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_size_high)) << 32;
>  	else
>  		ei->i_dir_acl = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_dir_acl);
> +	if (i_size_read(inode) < 0) {
> +		ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +		goto bad_inode;
> +	}
>  	ei->i_dtime = 0;
>  	inode->i_generation = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_generation);
>  	ei->i_state = 0;
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux