On Mon 07-11-16 12:15:41, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > The number of 'counters' elements needed in 'struct sg' is > super_block->s_blocksize_bits + 2. Presently we have 16 'counters' > elements in the array. This is insufficient for block sizes >= 32k. In > such cases the memcpy operation performed in ext4_mb_seq_groups_show() > would cause stack memory corruption. > > Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > index a937ac7..67e6fcb 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > @@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ static int ext4_mb_seq_groups_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > struct ext4_group_info *grinfo; > struct sg { > struct ext4_group_info info; > - ext4_grpblk_t counters[16]; > + ext4_grpblk_t counters[16 + 2]; How about using EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE + 2? It would be somewhat clearer what that means... Having a function returning number of buddy counters in a group info would be even better (and a constant for maximum number of counters) but that's an independent cleanup... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html