On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:16:56PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:24:00PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > - Validate fscrypt_context.format and fscrypt_context.flags. If > > unrecognized values are set, then the kernel may not know how to > > interpret the encrypted file, so it should fail the operation. > > > > - Validate that AES_256_XTS is used for contents and that AES_256_CTS is > > used for filenames. It was previously possible for the kernel to > > accept these reversed, though it would have taken manual editing of > > the block device. This was not intended. > > > > - Fail cleanly rather than BUG()-ing if a file has an unexpected type. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks, applied. (I plan to carry Eric's fscrypto changes ext4 git > tree; Jaeguk, I assume you have no objections?) No objection. Thanks, > > - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
