I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro, and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index c1ab3ec..12e4da5 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG ushort ext4_mballoc_debug __read_mostly; -module_param_named(mballoc_debug, ext4_mballoc_debug, ushort, 0644); +module_param_named(mballoc_debug, ext4_mballoc_debug, ushort, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH); MODULE_PARM_DESC(mballoc_debug, "Debugging level for ext4's mballoc"); #endif -- 2.9.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
