mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx writes: > The following patches begin to cleanup the request->cmd_flags and > bio->bi_rw mess. We currently use cmd_flags to specify the operation, > attributes and state of the request. For bi_rw we use it for similar > info and also the priority but then also have another bi_flags field > for state. At some point, we abused them so much we just made cmd_flags > 64 bits, so we could add more. > > The following patches seperate the operation (read, write discard, > flush, etc) from cmd_flags/bi_rw. > > This patchset was made against linux-next from today April 15 > (git tag next-20160415). > > I put a git tree here: > https://github.com/mikechristie/linux-kernel.git > The patches are in the op branch. Hi, Mike, That git tree doesn't seem to exist. I did manage to apply your patch set on top of next-20160415, though. So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems: - git clone fails - yum segfaults - many blktrace/blkparse issues, including incorrect cpu recorded in traces, null task names, and blkparse outputting nothing for a trace file several gigabytes in size. After that, I decided to back out your patches and test the base linux-next kernel. That kernel has none of those issues. So, either I'm missing some dependencies, or I think we've got some issues to iron out before this thing goes in. Before I dig any further, am I missing something? Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
