Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] percpu_stats: Enable 64-bit counts in 32-bit architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/08/2016 12:47 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Waiman.

On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 12:16:20PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
+/**
+ * __percpu_stats_add - add given count to percpu value
+ * @pcs : Pointer to percpu_stats structure
+ * @stat: The statistics count that needs to be updated
+ * @cnt:  The value to be added to the statistics count
+ */
+void __percpu_stats_add(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int stat, int cnt)
+{
+	/*
+	 * u64_stats_update_begin/u64_stats_update_end alone are not safe
+	 * against recursive add on the same CPU caused by interrupt.
+	 * So we need to set the PCPU_STAT_INTSAFE flag if this is required.
+	 */
+	if (IS_STATS64(pcs)) {
+		uint64_t *pstats64;
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		pstats64 = get_cpu_ptr(pcs->stats64);
+		if (pcs->flags&  PCPU_STAT_INTSAFE)
+			local_irq_save(flags);
+
+		u64_stats_update_begin(&pcs->sync);
+		pstats64[stat] += cnt;
+		u64_stats_update_end(&pcs->sync);
+
+		if (pcs->flags&  PCPU_STAT_INTSAFE)
+			local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+		put_cpu_ptr(pcs->stats64);
+	}
+}
Heh, that's a handful, and, right, u64_stats needs separate irq
protection.  I'm not sure.  If we have to do the above, it's likely
that it'll perform worse than percpu_counter on 32bits.  On 64bits,
percpu_counter would incur extra preempt_disable/enable() operations
but that comes from it not using this_cpu_add_return().  I wonder
whether it'd be better to either use percpu_counter instead or if
necessary extend it to handle multiple counters.  What do you think?

Thanks.


Yes, I think it will be more efficient to use percpu_counter in this case. The preempt_disable/enable() calls are pretty cheap. Once in a while, you need to take the lock and update the global count. How about I change the 2nd patch to use percpu_counter internally when 64-bit counts are needed in 32-bit archs, but use the regular percpu counts on 64-bit archs? If you are OK with that, I can update the patch accordingly.

Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux