On Thu 24-03-16 10:16:05, HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN) wrote: > > > > OK, I have something - Huang, can you check whether the attached patches also > > fix your data exposure issues please? The first patch is the original fix, patch two > > is a cleanup, patches 3 and 4 implement the speedup suggested by Ted. Patches > > are only lightly tested so far. I'll run more comprehensive tests later and in > > particular I want to check whether the additional complexity actually brings us > > some advantage at least for workloads which redirty pages in addition to writing > > some new ones using delayed allocation. > > > > Test done. > Both targets(kernel 3.10.63) PASS the power loss test with 10,000 cycles. Test with io-scheduler CFQ. Thanks for testing! I'll submit those patches once I verify there is some performance gain in only waiting... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
