Hello Ted, Andreas, Shilong posted an email here a week ago below. http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2015/10/30/2 we identified 10 project quota related xfstest and ported them into ext4/xxx. test number are 304, 305, 299, 244, 196, 134, 108, 107, 106, 050 in xfs. We ported 9/10 tests into ext4/xxx ext4/050 ext4/106 ext4/107 ext4/108 ext4/196 ext4/244 ext4/299 ext4/400 ext4/401 please check https://github.com/wangshilong/xfstests An another patch was not valid since quota utility is different. In order to run ported tests, patched quota-tools and Li Xi ported patch of e2fsprogs required. https://github.com/wangshilong/quota-tools/commits/project http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2015/10/29/2 Thanks Ihara 11/5/15, 11:45 PM , "linux-ext4-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Li Xi の代理)" <linux-ext4-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (pkuelelixi@xxxxxxxxx の代理)> wrote: >On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sep 13, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Li Xi <pkuelelixi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> The following patches propose an implementation of project quota >>> support for ext4. A project is an aggregate of unrelated inodes >>> which might scatter in different directories. Inodes that belong >>> to the same project possess an identical identification i.e. >>> 'project ID', just like every inode has its user/group >>> identification. The following patches add project quota as >>> supplement to the former uer/group quota types. >> >> We discussed this on the ext4 developer concall today and tried to >> move the landing of these patches forward. Some notes below: >> >> - Ted: agreed to reserve EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_PROJECT, s_prj_quota_inum, >> EXT4_PROJINHERIT_FL, and i_projid fields for use by project quota to >> avoid compatibility issues if patches are not landed immediately. >> - Ted: to do final check of inode flag value >> - ext4 project quota inode does not need to use a reserved inode, but >> could after Jan's patch to increase reserved inodes lands >> - Li Xi: identify xfstests subtests that are exercising project quota >> - submit patches to xfstests that will activate them for ext4 >> - keep in ext4 xfstests for testing until patches land upstream >> - this needs to be done before landing to ensure ext4 code works >> - Li Xi: document the behaviour of project quota (if no existing >> document exists for XFS already), some of this is already below >> - update man pages for df(1) and statfs(2) for subdir with project ID >> (i.e. that it returns only quota usage and limit for project ID) >> - Ted: where should document go? linux/Documentation/fs? ext4 wiki? >> - not a requirement for testing, can be done after landing >> >> - All: decide on a common tool for setting project ID on file/directory >> - don't want to require xfsutils in order to use project quota >> - start with chattr (using FS_IOC_FS{GET,SET}XATTR) in e2fsprogs >> - allows testing project quota with e2fsprogs/ext4 >> - chproj (like chown/chgrp) would also be an option >> - needs more discussion/development effort, goes into fileutils >> - this doesn't need to be decided immediately, and both could be done >> >Hi, > >I've pushed the patch of Ext4 as well as e2fsprogs. Shilong has added test >suits for ext4 project quota in xfstest, and will push patches soon. I >will write >necessary documentation both for manual and linux/Documentation/fs. > >Hopefully, at least the kernel patches of ext4 project quota will be merged >soon. > >Regards, >Li Xi >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
