Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Dmitry, > > I was investigating why ext4/304 is failing, and it's due to > defrag-fuzzer returning an error: Yep. You are right. I have out of tree patch which fix that. I'll send it to xfstests-dev list.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>From ee628504370564704e218ecf089f00c243b6fd12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:32:03 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] ext4/304 handle ENOSPC/EINVAL correctly
'defrag-fuzzer' is task which try to perform inplace defrag, inline-defrag
is basically of {falloc,ioc_swap} and may fail due to ENOSPC on first stage.
In that case IOCTL returns EINVAL (because we try to swap invalid extents)
Since this is hard core test then ENOSPC and corresponding EINVAL is expected.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/ext4/304 | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/ext4/304 b/tests/ext4/304
index 7b90f1d..81d69b8 100644
--- a/tests/ext4/304
+++ b/tests/ext4/304
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ donorname=test4.def
filename=test4
inplace=1
rw=randwrite
+ignore_error=,EINVAL
numjobs=4*${LOAD_FACTOR}
runtime=30*${TIME_FACTOR}
time_based
--
1.7.1
