On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:35:44AM +0100, Eric Curtin wrote: > Hi Ross, > > For all those int ret declarations. Why not declare and initialize all > on the same line? > > Regards, > Eric Because the return value 'ret' is set unconditionally later in the function as part of a call into the DAX code. This call needs to be made after we've done appropriate locking, though, which really is the point of the ext2 wrapper for the DAX function. Setting it to some random value and then unconditionally overwriting it later in the function is a bad pattern because a) the initial value is meaningless and b) it can hide coding errors where you are no longer setting the variable to something meaningful. The "warning: ‘ret’ is used uninitialized in this function" warnings would otherwise warn you that you've made a mistake. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
