On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 08:28:38AM -0300, Albino B Neto wrote: > 2015-09-02 20:47 GMT-03:00 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Darrick J. Wong > > <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Yes, that would be a bug. > > > > So the thing I'm happy to see is that the ext4 developers seem to > > unanimously agree that maintaining ext3 compatibility is part of their > > job, and nobody seems to be arguing for keeping ext3 around. As long > > as any possible regressions from ext3 removal have a clear "yup, it's > > on us" from the ext4 people, I don't mind removing it. I was > > expecting ext4 people to not be thrilled about supporting possible > > legacy cases. > > Good. > > The future of ext4 ? Are you (developers) write other file system ? Well I was working on a new one called EXT3000 with all new servos, but then I had to reuse the start and stop controls for something else and now the whole thing is SOL. I guess I'll go watch a movie instead. ;) --D > > -- > Albino B Neto > www.bino.us > "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" faw > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
