Re: two fsck.ext4's needed to clean filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> >> Is that considered ok? Should fsck restart itself or report
> >> 'filesystem still has errors' in this case?
> 
> It should.

Ok, good.

> > delme.fsck.damaged: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> > delme.fsck.damaged: 2053/25064 files (0.2% non-contiguous),
> > 97826/100000 blocks
> > Fsck lied about its success (result = 1)
> > pavel@amd:~/misc$ cp delme.fsck.original-damaged delme.report-2
> > 
> > (I can make the images public. Yes, it is artificial test.)
> 
> Please do - you're right, it should fix it on the first pass.

I put them on

http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/outgoing/delme.report-1
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/outgoing/delme.report-2

. Let me know if you can reproduce it.

Thanks and best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux